Saturday, June 17, 2006
chanced upon this
http://www.friendster.com/phyllisz. check out her affiliations.
why can people go 'oh i'm anti-christ and all' and not go 'oh i'm anti prophet mohammad'.
trust me, try saying the latter in school(infront of a teacher) or in public(infront of the police) and you'll guarantee yourself trouble. thats what i think at least.
but however, i feel that when people go 'oh i'm anti-christ' people will just go, 'oh. ok.'
i also feel that some people claim that they're 'anti-christ' because they think its cool. then why not be 'anti prophet mohammad'?
and to think people say that the only acceptable racism is what? islamophobia? (
http://soundvision.com/info/racism/islamophobia.asp)
so. question of the day. why the two different reactions towards two different yet similiar phrases.
food for thought.
i don't want to get myself in trouble. so in case they're some stupid people reading this, i better make myself clear first.
i am NOT anti-christ and i am NOT anti prophet mohammad.
i'm typing this entry out just because it suddenly came to my mind as to why are there such different reactions.
ok bye.
luck = birds
7:15 PM
------
